The peer review was pretty excellent, as usual we grouped into pairs and reviewed another two individuals. At the end of this stage, we went around each person and talked about the work of each individual. It was this informal group discussion that was most useful. The group was positive in regards to the quantity of my work, and seemed to agree with my sentients about ThoughtBubble; I had explained that ThoughtBubble was creatively stifling, as it required a lot of fan art without context or meaning. I was glad that Thought Bubble had ended, and I could move on to more radical projects that could push my work aesthetically and conceptually.
No comments:
Post a Comment