Responsive: Studio Session [2]

 During this session we presented the YCN briefs we had settled on, I had chosen the SyFy brief as it seemed to appeal to my interests.
I also found that the brief seemed quite open to individual interpretation, making it less restrictive.
In addition the brief specifically mentioned that it would prefer for entrants to avoid focussing on the content of the channels programming, which I would suggest will trip-up many entrants.

After discussing the briefs we noted the related information pertaining to each brief:

Following this we passed the brief to a peer who completed the same questions:

Having received this completed sheet we compared the many similar findings of our peers, and concluded that there are both positive and negative consequences of such an occurrence.

Positives:

.A large amount of similar findings suggests that one's own findings are validated

.This would also suggest that the brief itself is clear 

.One's own responses are more likely to be relatable and understood

.In a less tangible way, one might be encouraged to be more explorative with the brief

Negatives:

.Other people entering the competition may come up with similar ideas

.There is less diversity of interpretation

.There is the possibility that all the interpretations missed a key requirement or detail in the brief

Confusingly, there are positives had each person interpreted the briefs differently for example:

.More diversity

.It suggests that each participant has a better chance of creating something original